Posts Tagged ‘top management’

Does this scenario sound familiar? If so, G3 Solutions can help!

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

Top ten reasons why some quality systems are ineffective -

Reason #8 – The quality system is handled by one person

At G3 Solutions, we often receive calls from companies that are in need of expertise to help with quality system issues shortly before a third-party audit. This is often due to a lack of resources and downsizing from the recent economic nightmare of the past year.

Unfortunately, those employees that fell under the umbrella of “quality” were some of the first to be downsized. Since these employees were in charge of such key systems as internal audits, corrective actions and analysis of quality data, the maintenance of these systems would continually get put off until the last possible minute, if they were done at all. This is not the way a well implemented quality system should work.

Generally, the reason for this type of system meltdown is that most, if not all key functions of the system were handled by one employee whose primary purpose in the company was to be “the ISO person”. They were responsible for making sure all of that ISO 9001 “stuff” got done, and now they are not around – and no one has a clue as to what needs to be maintained.

A well implemented system will almost run by itself, with just minimal oversight by the selected management representative. Key systems should be shared and divided by top management; not handled solely by the quality manager or ISO coordinator. Not only will this shared strategy help maintain key processes, but will also encourage and promote employees to work with and improve the quality system.

For further information on how we can help, contact G3 Solutions today!

When it comes to training, don’t forget the follow up!

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

Most companies do a good job of providing proper employee training to ensure a qualified and competent workforce. Clause 6.2.2c in ISO 9001 clearly states that any training or other actions taken by top management to achieve competence must be evaluated for effectiveness. This also holds true for many standards such as ISO/TS 16949, AS9100, ISO 14001, ISO 13485 and others.

A common issue found during internal and external audits is the lack of evidence to demonstrate that effectiveness is evaluated. Keep in mind the standard does not prescribe how this is to be done, so there is tremendous flexibility in how this task can be completed.

Always consider that every ISO requirement does not need a new procedure, work instruction or form! Simple changes to existing process documents can, in most cases, do the job just fine. Make sure the method chosen provides a gage that is useful to the company in evaluating resource needs. Remember, the goal for any quality system is to provide value to an organization – not just fulfill standard requirements.

For more information, visit g3iso.com today!

Management Review – Are you meeting just for ISO reasons?

Monday, April 6th, 2009

The scenario is common in many companies. Quality planning meetings are held by top management on a regular basis, usually once a month or more, with discussions of key metrics, process performance, corrective actions, along with a host of other items. Notes are taken, actions are assigned and items are followed up on during the next meeting. So the question must be asked – why do we need a separate “Management Review” meeting? Just to fulfill an ISO requirement?

This is a good question. Having an official “Management Review” meeting (sometimes done by companies only once per year) just to make sure the 3rd party registrar auditor is happy can be quite an exercise in wasting time and reinforcing some unconstructive, even negative views of having a quality system in place. Employees (many of them in the ranks of top management) begin to question the value of the process.

Don’t let this happen to your organization!

Most quality standards such as ISO 9001, ISO/TS 16949, AS9100, ISO 13485, ISO 17025 and others have the requirement of management reviewing their quality system at defined intervals to ensure it is working as a catalyst for process effectiveness and/or improvement. A perfect opportunity to fulfill this requirement can be made during those normal meetings when top management is discussing various quality issues such as production scheduling or account reviews.

One method to efficiently maximize meeting time is to break down those ISO 9001-based requirements found in clauses 5.6.2 and 5.6.3 and review those topics during different meetings. Some topics such as quality metrics and measurables should be reviewed frequently while others such as the review of the quality policy can be looked once per year or as needed. Over the span of a year, all topics can be reviewed as part of the normal planning process. Providing you have the notes and objective evidence to show that all required items were part of the meetings, you have covered the management review requirement.

Remember, the whole point of having a review of the quality management system is to effectively facilitate continual improvement – not to just to fulfill a requirement.

Visit our website at g3iso.com today!